Rejected the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) being accused of large financial gains at the expense of the people of the largest Brazilian World Cup in terms of the cost in history.
FIFA said in a statement Tuesday he covered all operating costs for the tournament, which amounts to two billion dollars with funds collected from the sale of TV rights for the World Cup and marketing rights and did not get a single dime of taxpayer money Brazilians.
And will cost the tournament involving 32 teams Brazil 25.8 billion riyals (11.6 billion dollars) in investments Balastadat, airports, transportation and other improvements in infrastructure. Brazil and the third of the amount spent on the creation of new stadiums and renovation of another 12 in the city.
FIFA said that Brazil is chosen by the construction of 12 stadiums instead of eight or ten, although investments include infrastructure not directly related to the World Cup and will benefit the country for years to come.
It is believed that many Brazilians bill to host the World Cup excessive for a developing country has the most important priorities and say he should have been spending that money on improving public services such as health, education and transport.
And caused injury to the high cost of many disappointed towards the big event for the sport loved by Brazilians strongly. That has formed the Movement Against World Cup bid sparked massive protests last year and threatens to disrupt the arrival of fans to stadiums.
It is believed that the Brazilian FIFA World Cup on the investment project to the extent that Brazil was forced to change its laws to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages produced by the sponsors of FIFA.
Brazilians also complain of the surge in the price of match tickets that are held Balastadat new to the degree that many of the PARA will not be able to buy them. FIFA stated that there are tickets are cheap compared to other sports events such as the Olympics and Formula 1 and tennis tournaments.
FIFA said in a statement that he did not demand tax holiday for companies sponsoring and commercial activities during the World Cup, although he called for easing customs rules on the import of materials needed to organize the event, including computers and sports equipment and electronic bulletin boards.
He also denied FIFA is also accused of asking the Brazilian authorities to expel the families living next to the new stadiums or that have been updated or expel street vendors from areas surrounding the stadiums.
A statement from FIFA that because of security concerns, vendors must obtain permits for the sale of licensed products outside the stadiums and will undergo training and will stick to wearing uniforms.
And achieved the 2010 World Cup in South Africa total revenues amounted to FIFA, including $ 3.65 billion to $ 2.4 billion from the sale of television rights, but without an income selling tickets.
FIFA said that the expenses recorded in total, 1.3
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق